Cheguvera life history in telugu pdf professional#

So, is the position вЂњit was always this wayвЂќ or вЂњnothing can changeвЂќ, acceptable for social work? I believe that it is not as within all social practices, despite inertia, there is always the possibility of change as they are human constructions and therefore can be modified. It is a human construction and therefore changeable. If social order is an historical construction, then it is not something natural or attributable to some divinity. That is why the construction of order always involves the building of an institutional matrix which regulates the mode of exercising that power (Ansaldi, and Giordano, 2012: 683). It involves a complex web of processes in which the relations of power, exploitation and domination are constitutive of these processes. Coinciding with Waldo Ansaldi, an Argentine thinker, the social order is for me a historic, collective, political and controversial construction. Now, what are we talking about when we say social order? Why do we use the term social order? What do we mean about the concept of social order? There are so many interpretations because we can understand it in multiple ways. This is obviously a paradox, because the aspiration of social work is precisely to transform reality, to change the social order. This memory also allows us to observe that, for multiple reasons, we were not always able to question the status quo, the established order, with all the consequences that this entails, since what is not questioned cannot be transformed. We should recognize and appreciate it because we are historical subjects, we have memory. We cannot deny or ignore our own history. We need to dare to collectively build our own thinking, that is distinctive to social work and is not an appendage to the agenda of other international organisations. We need to start thinking about a new agenda for social work.

These are some of the questions that I will try to address in this article and I will do it with a deep conviction that we need to reinvent social work around the world.

So my presentation will turn around assumptions of power, politics and social work.Д«ut, what relations do we find between these three categories of thought? Why do we have to talk about these relationships? Is it important for social work that we speak about power and politics? What relations do we find between power and politics between social work and the theme of this Conference? And if we talk about power, we must talk about politics.

In this article I will make reference to the way that power constructs this. However, this difference has also been interpreted and built up in many ways. This rooting and construction as social subjects gives us a very unique imprint, a particular way of being, living, feeling and inhabiting our world, which always expresses a difference for each of us. All of us occupy a space and a time where we are constituted as social subjects.

Cheguvera life history in telugu pdf professional#

Why this initial clarification? Because I do not believe in the neutrality of discourse and interpretation, since knowledge production and professional practice are always located and crossed by sex/gender, ethnic/cultural, historical, linguistic and political relations. I will do this from my unique perspective as a woman, a salaried worker, an intellectual activist, a social militant and President of the Latin American and Caribbean Region of IFSW. As this theme can be interpreted in many ways, I will present a reflection on this topic from the richness and depth of Latin American thought. I will start my presentation by referring to the theme of our Conference SWSD 2016 held in Seoul, South Korea, Promoting the dignity and worth of people. Silvana Martinez Power, Politics and Social Work: The Need to Reinvent Social Work Worldwide вЂ“ Contributions from Latin American Thought